>Hi and happy new year to every, I'm just wondering if it's possible to use 
>Bacula with
>PostgreSQL 9.1.x because I'm trying several ways and have not luck because it 
>ask for
> libpq.so.4. Which is not available at CentOS 6. 

>I tried to fake the repos enabling CentOS 5 but then get this other error:

I can't imagine a good reason to do ever do that? While I use the provided 
Postgre
packages the fact those packages are built for centos 6 but don’t provide their 
own
non stock deps nor get them from any package in base is concerning. Last time I 
looked
at the spec it was so long and unruly I wasn’t surprised they became impossible 
to
maintain.

>So, any help on this?

Yes, I can only imagine the packages at that repo are built but not ever 
tested. If they
are tested, the QA environment certainly does not represent a stock setup as 
you just
found one of more issues with them. Now you will encounter other problems when
you remove those packages, you'll end up needing to prevent the scripts section 
from
executing as they likely won't work, then be forced to cleanup manually 
removing old
init scripts and working directories etc.

Install from a repo that is tested and does work, delete that repo file add the 
one from
Simone Caronni at 
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-6/x86_64/

These packages do work well and the maintainer validates his builds and uses a
more thorough build process. He's also responsive to suggestions from the list.

Good luck,
jlc
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users