Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Retention

2011-12-07 10:52:32
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Retention
From: Craig Van Tassle <cvantassle AT purdue DOT edu>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:50:46 -0500
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:45:23 -0500
John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Craig Van Tassle
> <cvantassle AT purdue DOT edu> wrote:
> > It seems like it would be better to not have a Recycle flag set for
> > my file based pools is that correct?
> >
> 
> No. Just put the volumes in a Full Pool, Differential pool ... to have
> different retention periods.
> 
> John

I have them in different pools. One Full (that is tapes), One that is
for my Differentials and my Incrimentals and one for my catalog.

-- 
Craig Van Tassle
HUBzero.org
System Administrator
YONG 1006
Desk Phone : (765)496-6413

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of 
discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model 
of a cloud services business. Read Now!
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>