On 10/05/11 09:37, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> I've been using non-batch insertion with postgres (following your dare,
> I think, Phil) for about a year. Backups are only about 8TB, but it
> works extremely well for us.
So, I just built bacula-5.1.14 from git, with batch disabled. And we'll
see how it goes.
Side note: It was unreasonably difficult to get it built correctly on
Solaris 10. I couldn't get a working 64-bit build at all, either with
gcc or with Sun Studio, and the only way I could get a correctly linked
32-bit bacula-dir was to temporarily chmod the MySQL 64-bit lib
directory 000. I'm reasonably certain this wasn't Bacula's fault.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
alaric AT caerllewys DOT net alaric AT metrocast DOT net phil AT
co.ordinate DOT org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|