Am 03.02.2011 um 14:30 schrieb Rodrigo Renie Braga:
>
> >>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:03:13 -0200, Rodrigo Renie Braga said:
> >
> > Before 28-Jan, I had only ran 1 Incremental Backup, because I  
> started the
> > backups for this Client at 26-Jan (which was a Full Backup).  
> Hence, I
> > believe that the Incremental Backup Pruned the Files From the  
> Incremental
> > Backup at 27-Jan and the Full Backup at 26-Jan.
>
> Yes, per-pool retention times don't work correctly in Bacula 5.0.x.   
> See
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT 
> net/msg42297.html
>
> __Martin
>
>
> Humm, very interesting... So, since I have three Pools for each  
> Incremental, Differential and Full with different retention Volume  
> Retention periods, basically I'd need to create three Clients  
> resources for each of these Pools... right?


Using one client: Using the greatest retention time in the client  
resource would do the job, when
the pools have valid (in terms of your specific period) volumes  
retention entries. They (volumes
retention) will force file- and job-deletion anyway.

Regards

PM



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users