> Both full and differential backup run with same speed. Going through
> filesystem shouldn't affect backup speed. Rsync (which I used for
> testing) is doing pretty much same job - compares checksum of each and
> every file and transfers it if its different. Its 50 times faster than
> Bacula doing same job (50 MB/s against 1 MB/s). Unless Bacula is doing
> something more than simply comparing md5 checksums it should run at
> comparable speed or I'm missing something...

Out of interest, which filesystem are you using on this volume?

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy AT karlsbakk DOT net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er 
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av 
idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og 
relevante synonymer på norsk.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users