On 09/13/10 19:04, Doug Sampson wrote:
>>> Are you using the --disable-libtool option to configure?  If so,
>>> you'll need the attached patch to make it work.
>>>
>>> __Martin
>>
>> Yes, I was. On more than one system. I should have mentioned this in
> the
>> first place. I will investigate applying this patch and report back.
>>
>
> The patch worked. To be accurate, the command as follows:
>
> # patch<  /path/to/bacula-5.0.3-libz.patch
>
> resulted in only one out of the four patches being applied (the second).
> Manually editing the two files for the remaining three patches did it.
> Did I do this wrong?

As long as they were applied carefully and at the correct places, manual 
patching is usually fine.  It's just time-consuming.  If the only 
problem is a line number offset, patch will usually spot it and apply 
the patch in the correct place in the code anyway.


-- 
   Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
   alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
          Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                  It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users