On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 00:46:06 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > It looks like you are running a 64-bit bacula-sd, so the libraries
> > should be in /usr/lib64.
> >
> > The files you found are in /usr/lib, which are normally 32-bit.
> > Either you have the 32-bit libraries installed by accident or the
> > 64-bit libraries are installed in the wrong place (broken rpm?).
> Indeed, I'm using CentOS 5.5 amd64. I was not doing the installation
> with RPM packages, but compile the source code obtained at the
> official site of Bacula. On sunday, doing tests comparing with the
> installation done with packages RPM, I realized that the difference
> was in which the libraries were in /usr/lib64.
>
> Doing again the configuration using this time the --libdir=/usr/lib64
> parameter, the problem was not reproduced. What it is strange to me is
> that in an installation of Debian Lenny amd64, I didn't do the
> configuration using --libdir=/usr/lib64 and in spite of putting the
> libraries in /usr/lib, I did not have the problem occurred in CentOS.
I already found the cause:
# ll /usr/lib
lib/ lib32/ lib64/
# ll -d /usr/lib
drwxr-xr-x 41 root root 20480 ago 8 01:56 /usr/lib
# ll -d /usr/lib32
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 abr 11 2009 /usr/lib32 -> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib
# ll -d /usr/lib64
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 abr 11 2009 /usr/lib64 -> lib
It's a smart move :-)
Regards,
Daniel
--
Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Lenny - Linux user #188.598
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
