On Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:19:50 +0200,
Pierre Bourgin wrote:

> Hello,

Hi, Pierre.

>>>> But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following
>>>> errors:
>>>>
>>>> [root@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula start
>>>> Starting the Bacula Storage daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-sd: error while 
>>>> loading shared libraries:
>>>> libbacpy-5.0.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
>>>> directory
>>>> Starting the Bacula File daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-fd: error while loading 
>>>> shared libraries:
>>>> libbacfind-5.0.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
>>>> directory
>>>> Starting the Bacula Director daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-dir: error while 
>>>> loading shared libraries:
>>>> libbacfind-5.0.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
>>>> directory
>>>>
>>>> But the files are:
>>>>
>>>> [root@localhost scripts]# ll /usr/lib/libbacpy-5.0.1.so
>>>> -rwxr-xr-- 1 root root 24083 jul 22 12:25 /usr/lib/libbacpy-5.0.1.so
>>>>
>>>> [root@localhost scripts]# ll /usr/lib/libbacfind-5.0.1.so
>>>> -rwxr-xr-- 1 root root 228325 jul 22 12:25 /usr/lib/libbacfind-5.0.1.so

>>> Have you ran ldconfig? It generates the "available libraries" cache for the
>>> dynamic linker, and the dynamic linker is relatively strict about not
>>> searching various locations throughout the filesystem.
>>>
>>> You can verify dynamic linking capabilities with "ldd /path/to/binary".
>>>
>>> Also, you may want to consider Security Enhanced Linux. Verify with the
>>> "sestatus" command whether SELinux is enforcing the targeted policy, and if
>>> so, consider restoring the default context for the files freshly installed
>>> using restorecon, and if all else fails, please get back to us with ls -Z
>>> output ;-)

>> I was also trying to install Bacula 5.0.1 using the same procedure as
>> mentioned in previous email and I have the same problem. This procedure
>> was successful in Debian with the difference that there I updated a
>> previous version instead of installing from scratch.
>>
>> Like I said, I followed the steps mentioned in the other email (I did
>> not run ldconfig manually) that had been successful in Debian. Using ldd
>> with these two libraries, I get the following:
>>
>> [root@localhost init.d]# ldd /usr/lib/libbacpy-5.0.1.so
>>          libstdc++.so.6 =>  /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002b4eb5ee7000)
>>          libm.so.6 =>  /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002b4eb61e7000)
>>          libc.so.6 =>  /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b4eb646a000)
>>          libgcc_s.so.1 =>  /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00002b4eb67c2000)
>>          /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000000320a400000)
>>
>> [root@localhost init.d]# ldd /usr/lib/libbacfind-5.0.1.so
>>          libstdc++.so.6 =>  /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002b97a2131000)
>>          libm.so.6 =>  /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002b97a2431000)
>>          libc.so.6 =>  /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b97a26b4000)
>>          libgcc_s.so.1 =>  /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00002b97a2a0c000)
>>          /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000000320a400000)

> what is the output of 'ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-sd' ?

# ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-sd
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00000032b9000000)
        libbacpy-5.0.1.so => not found
        libbaccfg-5.0.1.so => not found
        libbac-5.0.1.so => not found
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00000032b8400000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00000032b8000000)
        libssl.so.6 => /lib64/libssl.so.6 (0x00000032bb000000)
        libcrypto.so.6 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.6 (0x00000032ba800000)
        libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00000032ba000000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00000032b8800000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00000032ba400000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000032b7c00000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000032b7800000)
        libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 
(0x00000032bc400000)
        libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00000032bdc00000)
        libcom_err.so.2 => /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00000032bcc00000)
        libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00000032bd800000)
        libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libkrb5support.so.0 
(0x00000032be000000)
        libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00000032bc800000)
        libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00000032bd400000)
        libselinux.so.1 => /lib64/libselinux.so.1 (0x00000032b9400000)
        libsepol.so.1 => /lib64/libsepol.so.1 (0x00000032b8c00000)


Apparently, in spite of being the libraries in the operating system, for
some reason it is not finding them.

Thanks for your reply.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
Daniel Bareiro - GNU/Linux registered user #188.598
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux with uptime:
17:52:49 up 29 days, 22:45, 11 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.01

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users