>>> That's what I intend to do as well by changing the find to be this:
>>>
>>> find /mnt/mybook/bacula -mtime +65
>>>
>>> This finds all files that haven't been modified in 65 days or more. If
>>> the retention period is set to 60 days, this would be a pretty safe way
>>> to do it.
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me. Some may want different retention periods per pool
>> but with labeling the volumes this would be easy to adjust.
>
> True, there is that approach.
> What I'm actually thinking of is going the other way:  get Bacula to
> tell me what volumes have been pruned and moved into the Scratch pool,
> then delete them and their disk files.
>

That would be a little more complicated but more accurate as you are
letting bacula decide what gets removed instead of externally forcing
the issue.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users