Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration Job and Next Pool configuration

2009-12-11 09:30:41
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Migration Job and Next Pool configuration
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:27:54 GMT
>>>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:00:52 +0100, Daniel Kamm said:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I am considering to use migration jobs to set up a D2D2T backup 
> scenario. I am actually considering to use pools like that:
> 
> 
>                                   Migration Job
> 
>             Backup Job                 --> WEEKLY1 Tape Pool
>                                       /
>   Backup data  --> DEFAULT Disk Pool  --> WEEKLY2 Tape Pool
>                                       \
>                                        --> WEEKLY3 Tape Pool
> 
> As far as I see, Next Pool configuration can only be done in the Pool 
> resource and can only be done once. If I need n tape pools, I also need 
> to configure n disk pools.
> 
> I expected to be able to override NextPool directive at the Schedule 
> (like you can override Pool directive there to select different pools 
> for weekly backups). That would make it possible to have one disk pool 
> and n tape pools for migration. Am I correct, that this is not possible?

It isn't possible using the normal approach, but see

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.bacula.devel/14084

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>