Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration Job and Next Pool configuration

2009-12-08 05:39:45
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Migration Job and Next Pool configuration
From: Daniel Kamm <ylz AT ylz DOT ch>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:35:45 +0100
James Harper wrote:
>> I am considering to use migration jobs to set up a D2D2T backup
>> scenario. I am actually considering to use pools like that:
>>
>>
>>                                   Migration Job
>>
>>             Backup Job                 --> WEEKLY1 Tape Pool
>>                                       /
>>   Backup data  --> DEFAULT Disk Pool  --> WEEKLY2 Tape Pool
>>                                       \
>>                                        --> WEEKLY3 Tape Pool
>>
> 
> Why do you need multiple tape pools? Is the a reason why a (say) 17 day
> retention policy on your tapes wouldn't work?

I want to keep the tapes from 1 month up to one year, depending on the 
retention policy of that particular pool. (And of course even longer for 
long term archiving.)

  - Dan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>