Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration Job and Next Pool configuration

2009-12-08 05:32:29
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Migration Job and Next Pool configuration
From: "James Harper" <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
To: "Daniel Kamm" <ylz AT ylz DOT ch>, <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:29:14 +1100
> 
> I am considering to use migration jobs to set up a D2D2T backup
> scenario. I am actually considering to use pools like that:
> 
> 
>                                   Migration Job
> 
>             Backup Job                 --> WEEKLY1 Tape Pool
>                                       /
>   Backup data  --> DEFAULT Disk Pool  --> WEEKLY2 Tape Pool
>                                       \
>                                        --> WEEKLY3 Tape Pool
> 

Why do you need multiple tape pools? Is the a reason why a (say) 17 day
retention policy on your tapes wouldn't work?

James

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>