Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Rif: Re: LTO3 performance

2009-01-08 07:54:32
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Rif: Re: LTO3 performance
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Craig White <craigwhite AT azapple DOT com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:51:43 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Craig White wrote:

> funny thing is that amanda developers are adamant that you disable
> hardware compression and use software compression instead.

Amanda devs are adament about a few things and aren't always correct

Hardware compression on older technologies left a lot to be desired,
however LTO hardware compression is fast and comparable to gzip/fast in
terms of efficiency.

> Obviously it takes longer and more cpu power to compress the files in
> software before storing them on the tape and if you leave hardware
> compression on and use software compression too, the files probably grow
> in size.

Modern tape hardware compression has a "step-aside" algoritm - output data
is compared to input data on the fly and if there is no gain from
compression then it's not used and the data is written directly to tape.

> Commercial backup software just seems to always use hardware
> compression.

See above.

Software compression was probably worthwhile when CPUs and disks could
trivially outrun tape drives. That hasn't been the case for at least half
a decade.

AB




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users