also sprach Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chrome AT real-time DOT com> 
[2010.11.03.2020 +0100]:
> Run full backups on all hosts, then BackupPC_nightly?

also sprach Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com> [2010.11.03.2022 +0100]:
> I'd run new full backups as soon as practical. That will at least
> fix up anything missing in the latest run which is usually the
> most important.

Yeah, that's surely a good idea. I was wondering mostly about
cleanup actually.

I assume BackupPC_nightly removes everything from the pool with
a link count == 1. Hence, the worst that could happen is that all
previous backups would be rendered invalid, no?

Thanks guys,

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"they that can give up essential liberty
 to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                                  -- benjamin franklin
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus AT madduck DOT net

digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve Improved Network Security with IP and DNS Reputation.
Defend against bad network traffic, including botnets, malware, 
phishing sites, and compromised hosts - saving your company time, 
money, and embarrassment.   Learn More! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpdev2dev-nov

_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/