> And for the record, I don't necessarily disagree with you that there
> are things that can be improved but your attitude is going to get you
> less than nowhere. Also, the coders are hardly stupid and there are
> good reasons for the various tradeoffs they have made that you would
> be wise in trying to understand before disparaging them and their
> software.

Hi I didn't want to sound rude. This was my 6th mail regarding this problem (5 
to this list, 1 personally to Craig) I think. In the first 5 mails I was 
reporting my observtaions asking whether what I am seeing is expected behaviour 
or an error on my part, each mail providing more detail as I was trying to find 
the source of the problem. In my personal mail to Craig I stated the same 
question and asked for pointers as to where in RsyncP might be the problem so 
that I can start working on a fix (if possible). Not one single one of the 
mails got a reply, so I kept looking myself for an answer, both in Google and 
the source code. This last mail was just me being happy that I found out that 
this is indeed expected behaviour, that I can stop looking for problems in my 
setup and as a record for any future users who observe this behaviour.

Regards
Harald





-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/