Re: [BackupPC-users] idea
2008-09-04 12:09:56
rouilj-backuppc AT renesys DOT com wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 06:57:39PM -0600, dan wrote:
>> this was on an rsync incremental. There was no error in the Xfers log, it
>> is like the file was not there. The atime on the file is from before the
>> backup so I know the file was there. I have only seen this one time.
>>
>> The idea of marking it partial is that backuppc would then kick in on the
>> next wakeup and try to finish the job because there was not a completed
>> backup within the schedule. Then the next backup would have very little to
>> transfer and may pick up the missing file.
>
> Are you sure this wasn't a case of an incremental backup where the
> atime/mtime on the file was from before the prior incremental? Rsync
> incrementals (IIRC) skip files that should have been captured in a
> prior incremental (or a prior full).
Even incrementals in rsync are supposed to check that a copy exists with
the same mtime and file length in the previous full (or full or
incremental if you are doing incremental levels).
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|