|
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option
2005-12-20 07:29:39
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:56:26PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I think the essence is that while both are encryption, one is applied
> to transport and one to storage.
Is it really _that_ different? IMHO, a public-key method encrypted on
the client would be good for both, transport _and_ storage.
--
No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com
-- Josef Wolf -- jw AT raven.inka DOT de --
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, (continued)
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Kevin Till
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Kevin Till
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option,
Josef Wolf <=
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Jon LaBadie
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Chris Lee
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Brian Cuttler
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
|
|
|
