Amanda-Users

Re: amanda over wireless network

2005-11-18 18:11:06
Subject: Re: amanda over wireless network
From: Paul Yeatman <pyeatman AT mamacass.ucsd DOT edu>
To: "Amanda user's group" <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:52:56 -0800
->>In response to your message<<-
  --received from Gene Heskett--
>
> On Thursday 17 November 2005 22:02, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:03:08PM -0800, Paul Yeatman wrote:
> >> Hmmmm, I set the server side etimeout to 2600s.  Still get (from an
> >> amstatus)
> >>
> >>  pjmac:/    0 planner: [Estimate timeout from pjmac]
> >>
> >> and the amanda report now gives this (mind you, this client
> >> is the only entry in this "test" config)
> >>
> >>  Estimate Time (hrs:min)    2:10
> >>
> >> 2 hours and 10 minutes!
> >>
> >> The message from amandad on the client is virtually the same
> >>
> >>  <snip>
> >>  amandad: time 0.038: running service
> >> "/usr/local/libexec/amanda/2.4.5p1/sendsize" amandad: time 1244.905:
> >> sending REP packet:
> >>  ----
> >>  Amanda 2.4 REP HANDLE 000-30F3BC2A55000000 SEQ 1132261451
> >>  OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe7f;
> >>  / 0 SIZE 17648480
> >>  ----
> >>
> >>  amandad: time 1254.905: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> >>  amandad: time 1254.905: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> >>  amandad: time 1264.906: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> >>  amandad: time 1264.906: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> >>  amandad: time 1274.906: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> >>  amandad: time 1274.906: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> >>  amandad: time 1284.906: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> >>  amandad: time 1284.906: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> >>  amandad: time 1294.907: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> >>  amandad: time 1294.907: waiting for ack: timeout, giving up!
> >>  amandad: time 1294.907: pid 29584 finish time Thu Nov 17 14:52:41
> >> 2005
> >>
> >> Shouldn't the approx. 1255s required to get the estimate fall clearly
> >> within the 2600s allowed?
> >>
> >> Not sure where things are going wrong now
> >
> >ISTR someone having a problem with a network setting that caused
> >connection drops if there was no activity for a particular period.
> >Could it be something like this, not dealing with amanda at all?
> >
> >IIRC the poster was going to try to setup a heartbeat application
> >running whenever amanda was to try and keep their connection up.
> 
> I don't recall seeing a message indicating that it worked, so either it
> did, or that user gave up.
> 
> Here is what I would do:
> 
> In roots crontab, setup a ping to the other address over the rf link,
> using the -i300 option which would ping the other machine at 5 minute
> intervals.  Then, after amdump is done, have it do a 'killall ping'. 
> 
> Or one could use the -c36 number option to have it die after say 36
> pings which would be 3 hours.  Lots of ways to do that & I'm just 
> thinking
> out loud.
> 
> Start this about 1 minute before amdump is fired off by the users
> crontab that runs amdump.
> 
> And after you have verified that it works, put a redirect to /dev/null
> in roots crontab entry to kill the email you'll get from it.
> 
> HTH.
> 

Just to make sure I'm following, the point of this is to make sure that
the (wireless) internet connection with the laptop is never lost for
more than 5 minutes?

Paul

-- 
Paul Yeatman       (858) 534-9896        pyeatman AT ucsd DOT edu
             ==================================
             ==Proudly brought to you by Mutt==
             ==================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>