Re: amflush problem
2004-10-15 16:02:08
[root@salerno daily]# du -sh *
11G 20040823
117M 20040910
31G 20041012
25G 20041014
Our drive is using LTO ultrium 100/200 GB cartridge + tape
Frederic Medery
System Administrator
LexUM, University of Montreal
Gene Heskett wrote:
I see that you are using a 1GB chunk size setting, and just a rather
cursory mental addup of one of them indicates it would take about a
21 to 22GB tape to actually hold just the dump of
pisa.lan.lexum.pri._home_projets
Are your tapes that big? We apparently neglected to specifically ask
that.
Since amanda cannot span an individual dump (all those chunks added
together again) over more than one tape, it probably totals things up
and throws up its hands in defeat since the backup is bigger than the
tape.
The design of amanda tends to want its disklist to be rather lengthy,
and broken up such that no one backup image is more than say 10% of a
tape, and with a few that may be only a few megabytes, which can then
allow amanda to juggle its scheduleing to facilitate a consistent
amount of data (on the tape, after any gzip compression if used) each
night. I have had it fill the tapes to 97+% many nights in a row
without ever hitting the dreaded EOT here.
Unless the budget has the sheckles for a bigger drive, I think I'd be
rather inclined to rm -fR all of this, and breakup the disklist
entries into smaller sized pieces and more of them. Start with the
biggest one tonight, making 4 or 5 pieces (disklist entries) out of
it, do the next biggest one tomorrow night, etc till you have it
carved down into gigabyte or smaller hunks per entry. Or get a
larger drive, much larger. See sheckles above...
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: amflush problem, (continued)
- Re: amflush problem, Frank Smith
- Re: amflush problem, Jon LaBadie
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Frank Smith
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Paul Bijnens
- Re: amflush problem, Jon LaBadie
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Frank Smith
- Re: amflush problem, Gene Heskett
- Re: amflush problem,
Frederic Medery <=
- Re: amflush problem, Gene Heskett
Re: amflush problem, Jon LaBadie
|
|
|