Re: amflush problem
2004-10-14 15:01:35
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 01:45:13PM -0500, Frank Smith wrote:
> --On Thursday, October 14, 2004 13:12:22 -0400 Frederic Medery <dist-list AT
> LEXUM.UMontreal DOT CA> wrote:
>
> > Here is my amflush command :
> > Scanning /amanda/daily...
> > 20040823: found Amanda directory.
> > 20040910: found Amanda directory.
> > 20041012: found Amanda directory.
> >
> > Multiple Amanda directories, please pick one by letter:
> > A. 20040823
> > B. 20040910
> > C. 20041012
> > Select directories to flush [A..C]: [ALL]
> >
> >
> > As you can see I saw the dump I can flush, The prob occure with each dump
>
> Just because the directory is there doesn't mean anything is in it. What
> does an 'ls -lR' of one of those directories show? Sometimes Amanda doesn't
> properly clean up the holdingdisk. The directory only gets removed if its
> completely empty and sometimes there are 0 byte chunks left behind if a
> client backup fails.
Similar to what I was going to write. Minor addition,
there could also be "garbage" file and/or directories
in the holding disk directories. These would prevent
the removal of the dated directories.
Check the dated directories for files of size >0 with
names of the format:
<host>.<DLE name>.<bkup level>.<chunk number>
The ".chunk number" will not be present for the first
and/or only chunk of any DLE.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Frank Smith
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Frank Smith
- Re: amflush problem,
Jon LaBadie <=
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Frank Smith
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Paul Bijnens
- Re: amflush problem, Jon LaBadie
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Frank Smith
- Re: amflush problem, Gene Heskett
- Re: amflush problem, Frederic Medery
- Re: amflush problem, Gene Heskett
|
|
|