Amanda-Users

Re: amrecover from large tapes

2004-06-21 04:26:37
Subject: Re: amrecover from large tapes
From: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
To: Jamie Wilkinson <jaq AT spacepants DOT org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:19:05 +0200
Jamie Wilkinson wrote:

 > So, short of recompiling to increase READ_TIMEOUT like amrecover
suggests, is there any simple way to get the restore process to work
faster?  Is there a neat way of keeping a precomputed index of the tape
somewhere so that amrestore can seek to the right image straight away?

In amanda 2.4.3 these two parameters in amanda.conf were introduced:

  amrecover_do_fsf yes
  amrecover_check_label yes

You need both set to yes if using a vanilla 2.4.4p2 or earlier (a little
bug which was fixed a few weeks later, and is in all current snapshots).


--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation                            Tel  +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM    Fax  +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/          email:  Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now:  exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit,  ZZ, :q, :q!,  M-Z, ^X^C,  logoff, logout, close, bye,  /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt,  abort,  hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e,  kill -1 $$,  shutdown, *
* kill -9 1,  Alt-F4,  Ctrl-Alt-Del,  AltGr-NumLock,  Stop-A,  ...    *
* ...  "Are you sure?"  ...   YES   ...   Phew ...   I'm out          *
***********************************************************************



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>