On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:10:54AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
>> instead an internal IDE drive, they went out and got a 250GB
>> drive and installed it before I revisited.  Until now I've
>> never seen a 240GB file system :))
>
> Bah:
>
> [jlb@chaos jlb]$ df -h
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> *snip*
> philip:/data          535G  396G  140G  74% /data
> fluffy:/moredata      1.8T  1.3T  543G  71% /moredata
> buckbeak:/emfd        2.0T  1.2T  822G  60% /emfd


BRAGGART!!  :))


> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 at 10:02am, Gene Heskett wrote
> 
> > >Even More F..ing Data ?
> > 
> > Are we allowed to chuckle here?  From the nameing convention used, 
> > that would be the next logical progression.  But now I wonder what 
> > the 4th lashup will be called if and when its needed?  I hope you are 
> > planning ahead.  :-)
> 
> The only thing I've come up with is "Enough 'Fine' Data Already", but 
> that's just reusing the joke of the 3rd name.  I'm open to suggestions...
> 

How about MOAFD ?

  (Mother Of All Fine Data)

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)