On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 07:53:32PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 23 October 2003 09:32, Dan Willis wrote:
> >Hello. I am still experimenting with my Amanda setup. I have
[clip]
> Generally speaking, dump is not the prefered utility for use with
> amanda. We seem to have gradually come to prefer tar, in any version
> 1.13-19 or higher.
Gene, though that is the conventional wisdom for Linux ext2/ext3
because of kernel buffer inconsistency issues, I don't think Dan
mentioned his OS; for some OS's, like Solaris, (ufs)dump is arguably
the preferred solution unless you require excludes or subdirectories.
--
Jay Lessert jay_lessert AT accelerant DOT net
Accelerant Networks Inc. (voice)1.503.439.3461
Beaverton OR, USA (fax)1.503.466.9472
|