Amanda-Users

Re: Problem with compression?

2003-02-24 14:48:39
Subject: Re: Problem with compression?
From: John Oliver <joliver AT john-oliver DOT net>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:14:23 -0800
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:48:13PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> As someone else mentioned, much of that particular backup run was 
> level 0.  Lets do another experiment, what do you get (post it 
> please) when you do an "amadmin /config/ balance"?

[root@backup root]# su amanda -c "amadmin DailySet1/ balance"
bash: /root/.bashrc: Permission denied

 due-date  #fs   orig KB    out KB  balance
-------------------------------------------
 2/24 Mon    0         0         0     ---
 2/25 Tue    0         0         0     ---
 2/26 Wed    1   1828210   1114735   -82.0%
 2/27 Thu    1  21906920  19991316  +223.0%
 2/28 Fri   17  19485440   9842074   +59.0%
 3/01 Sat    0         0         0     ---
 3/02 Sun    0         0         0     ---
-------------------------------------------
TOTAL       19  43220570  30948125  6189625  (estimated 5 runs per
dumpcycle)

> Oh, and I've quit trying to reply to your email account as posted in 
> the messages you send because they always bounce from a different 
> address that apparently isn't accessable for incoming email.  I've 
> had many bounced messages, and had to open the bounce to see where 
> I'd sent it because the address it bounced from was not an address 
> I'd sent anything to.  Train up a spam filter, its easier than 
> antagonizing the people who are trying to help you.

I would imagine that the "different address" would be postmaster@ my
mail server... :-)  Filtering is a waste of time.  I'm sorry if you feel
"antagonized", but I would submit that connections from the SMTP server
you use are refused for a very good reason, and instead of shooting the
messenger, you might want to consider looking into what that reason is
and having it fixed.

Besides, I don't ask for personal replies from a mailing list.
*Nothing* annoys me more than to Google for a problem and find tons of
references to the exact same problem I'm having, but no solutions
because replies were emailed to the original poster instead of to the
list where they could be archived... :-)

> The email address that shows in the messages I send is real.

As is mine...

> And I 
> only get spam from two sources, my inbox, and an older computer 
> list I'm subscribed to.  99% of which goes straight to the 
> uce AT ftc DOT gov & I don't see them other than scanning the folder for 
> filter upchucks before it all goes back out.

Blindly bouncing spam to that address isn't accomplishing anything.
IIRC, they don't even bother with it any more... they wound up with
hundreds of millions of spam emails in their collection, enough to keep
them occupied until sometime after the heat-death of the Universe.  A
couple of them will get light slaps on the wrist, and all of them will
keep on spamming :-(

-- 
John Oliver, CCNA                            http://www.john-oliver.net/
Linux/UNIX/network consulting         http://www.john-oliver.net/resume/
***               sendmail, Apache, ftp, DNS, spam filtering         ***
****                Colocation, T1s, web/email/ftp hosting          ****

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>