ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?

2008-04-16 10:44:11
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
From: "Remeta, Mark" <MRemeta AT SELIGMANDATA DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:42:49 -0400
Maybe it has something to do with IBM's recent audit of TSM licensee's.
I know our management is seriously thinking of abandoning TSM due to
cost.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Howard Coles
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:19 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: TSM being abandoned?

I'd say businesses are migrating in all kinds of directions.  I'd think
that you'd see some migrating from other products to TSM as well,
however, it would be interesting to see current numbers.

See Ya'
Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Orin Rehorst
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:13 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
> 
> A VTL vendor said he is seeing a number of mid-sized businesses 
> migrating from TSM to NBU (Symantec). Do you think this is true? My 
> concern is that the pool of support techs will shrink and put us in a 
> bind.
> 
> Regards,
> Orin
> 
> Orin Rehorst
> Port of Houston



Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the 
person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please delete this 
material immediately. 
Please be advised that someone other than the intended recipients, including a 
third-party in the Seligman organization and government agencies, may review 
all electronic communications to and from this address.