Re: Disk pool size vs large file
2001-06-21 15:51:26
My experience with hugh files that exceed the backuppool is adjusting the
high and low thresholds to a high=85 and a low=70. So far the tape migration
will start when the 85% of the storage is used and the mount point will
remain until the 70% is meet. The default of 15 timeout for the tapes will
allow the backuppool to reach the 85% mark again, therefore sending the
information to tape again.
Knock on wood, but so far I have had no problems with large files.
Joe Cascanette
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Disk pool size vs large file, Sam Schrage
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Richard Sims
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file,
Joe Cascanette <=
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Sam Schrage
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Bradley Tidd
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Hrouda Tomáš
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Lee, Lin-Yen
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, France, Don G (Pace)
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Jeff Bach
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Richard Sims
- Re: Disk pool size vs large file, Lisa Cabanas
|
|
|