Yes, that's the ticket. It used to be called SLOWINCREMENTAL (ON/OFF)
and as previously stated it chops the information coming back from the
adsm server into bits at, I think, the directory level, and performs
the incremental one directory at a time. More network traffic but
less memory usage.
We use it a lot for Mac users that refuse or can't change their
running adsm size under GETINFO. Sigh.
.. joe.f.
Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Programmer, UC Berkeley
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Bob Stoller wrote:
> Thanks to those of you who responded to my question yesterday
> about out of memory. Here is a followup:
...
> Finally I tried the backup with -memoryefficient=yes and then
> it ran fine. What is that option really doing? Any other ideas
> about how to make this work without that option? Does my
> memory ulimit really need to be more than 512 megs?
|