Do NOT set it to 0 as that will cause it to pull all the routes use
1 instead.

Paul

Kain, Becki (B.) wrote:

Do I need it configured at all?  Apparently, this person's concern was
under HPOV, that when it discovered a router, it made 6000 individual

snmp get statements for each routing statement.

What is the impact of setting this to 0?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT 
com]
On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:53 PM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled


This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route
Entries".

Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself.  If
you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else.

Are you having a problem or just worried about one?

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group




            "Kain, Becki

            \(B.\)"

            <bkain1 AT ford DOT com>

To Sent by: <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>

            owner-nv-l@lists.

cc us.ibm.com

Subject [nv-l] Routing table pulled

            10/14/2005 01:41

            PM





            Please respond to

                  nv-l









Folks:


Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing
table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because
it pulled one route at a time.  Does NV do the same thing when it
discovers a node?


Thanks