Do I need it configured at all?  Apparently, this person's concern was
under HPOV, that when it discovered a router, it made 6000 individual
snmp get statements for each routing statement.  

What is the impact of setting this to 0?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT 
com]
On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:53 PM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled


This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route
Entries".

Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself.  If
you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else.

Are you having a problem or just worried about one?

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group


 

             "Kain, Becki

             \(B.\)"

             <bkain1 AT ford DOT com>
To 
             Sent by:                  <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>

             owner-nv-l@lists.
cc 
             us.ibm.com

 
Subject 
                                       [nv-l] Routing table pulled

             10/14/2005 01:41

             PM

 

 

             Please respond to

                   nv-l

 

 





Folks:


Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing
table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because
it pulled one route at a time.  Does NV do the same thing when it
discovers a node?


Thanks