Ok, did u put them in the "Exclude" or "Include" list of the Seed file.??

"Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn AT pemcocorp DOT com> Sent by: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com 12-05-05 09:17 PM Please respond to nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com

To <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com> cc Subject RE: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

Hi Paul,

Good point.  I've tried adding them to the netmon.seed "limit discovery"
but they still keep getting discovered.  Any ideas?


Glen Warn
PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)
glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com
206-628-5770

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com]
On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:10 AM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

Glen,
Why discover them in the first place?

Paul


Glen Warn wrote:

> I have several remote access subnets (a few dial, some vpn) where
> remote users are allocated DHCP addresses.  I do not want to manage
> these nodes and set them to unmanaged - but Netview keeps setting them

> back to managed (and inevitably changes their state to down) - I
> suspect because it detects the connection as new (different MAC
> address perhaps) even though the IPs are the same.  Is there way to
> permanently set a block of addresses to unmanaged?
>  
> Netview 7.1.4
>  
> Thanks for your time,
> Glen Warn
> PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com
> <mailto:glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com> 206-628-5770
>