nv-l

RE: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

2005-05-12 13:13:33
Subject: RE: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
From: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn AT pemcocorp DOT com>
To: <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:10:10 -0700
Hi Paul,

Do you mean a layer of my map or a 2nd entirely different map ( I did
have 2 a few months ago but have only 1 now)? 


Glen Warn
PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)
glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com
206-628-5770

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT 
com]
On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:04 AM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

Glen,
It sounds like you might have these devices on more than one map.
Run an ovwls and post the output.

Paul


Glen Warn wrote:

>Hi Paul,
>
>I've actually tried putting them in both ways:
>
>!10.10.10.25-35 (as an example)
>or
>!10.10.10.25
>!10.10.10.26
>!10.10.10.27
>!10.10.10.28
>etc
>
>Neither seem to make Netview ignore them.  I am assuming the 
>#Workstations is a comment on the end of line for admin purposes - if 
>that is wrong please let me know.
>
>Glen Warn
>PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com 
>206-628-5770
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm 
>DOT com]
>On Behalf Of Paul
>Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:28 AM
>To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
>Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
>
>Glen,
>If its a range of addresses you can add something like this to the
>seedfile:
>
>!10.10.10.25-200 #Workstations
>
>Or something like that. Im not sure how the "limit discovery" puts it 
>int the seedfile off the top of my head.
>
>Paul
>
>
>Glen Warn wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi Paul,
>>
>>Good point.  I've tried adding them to the netmon.seed "limit
>>    
>>
>discovery"
>  
>
>>but they still keep getting discovered.  Any ideas? 
>>
>>
>>Glen Warn
>>PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com 
>>206-628-5770
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm 
>>DOT com]
>>On Behalf Of Paul
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:10 AM
>>To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
>>Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
>>
>>Glen,
>>Why discover them in the first place?
>>
>>Paul
>>
>>
>>Glen Warn wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I have several remote access subnets (a few dial, some vpn) where 
>>>remote users are allocated DHCP addresses.  I do not want to manage 
>>>these nodes and set them to unmanaged - but Netview keeps setting 
>>>them
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>back to managed (and inevitably changes their state to down) - I 
>>>suspect because it detects the connection as new (different MAC 
>>>address perhaps) even though the IPs are the same.  Is there way to 
>>>permanently set a block of addresses to unmanaged?
>>>
>>>Netview 7.1.4
>>>
>>>Thanks for your time,
>>>Glen Warn
>>>PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com 
>>><mailto:glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com> 206-628-5770
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>