James,
Many thanks.. You are right.. I agree whatever you
said. First of all, the mibs attachment did not get
throu' may be b'cause they were big in size.. 
The trap below is from TEC and as you said there is no
"NO FMT found in trapd". This means trap was formatted
at Netview. Even i felt the same that there is some
problem at source Nokia sending trap. 
What i expected was to get the message in some sort of
decent format saying " Link down or Up" instead of
belwo trap with OID etc. I guess there is a way to
change that.. 
There are bunch of Nokia devices which are coming in
with 0.0.0.0. and these devices are coming from
devices which are in DMZ..
Thanks again..
Larry

--- James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Larry,
> 
> The listserver will not forward large appends, so
> your posting does not
> have MIB files attached.
> 
> I think that part of the problem here is that you
> are expecting more than
> you can get.  You say for example that the trapd.log
> shows that the hostname of the Nokia device is
> 0.0.0.0. and even the
> origin.  Well, that is not a formatting issue that
> you can solve by loading
> a MIB.  That means that the Nokia device is actually
> sending 0.0.0.0 as the
> source address of the trap.  We could verify this
> with a trapd.trace and a
> hex dump of the incoming trap if needs be, but the
> source of this problem
> is most likely to be the configuration of the remote
> Nokia device itself.
> 
> I also notice in your previous append that you
> posted this example
>  " TEC_ITS_BASE - Agent Interface Down (linkDown
> > Trap)
> > enterprise:ENTERPRISES
> (1.3.6.1.4.1.94.1.21.2.1.12)
> > args(1):  [1]
> > mgmt.mib-2.interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.5
> > (Integer): 5  "
> 
> as what you saw.  Is this from trapd.log or from
> TEC?   The reason I ask is
> because when the trap definition in trapd.conf is
> missing, the trap will
> show up in trapd.log with a "wrapper" around it
> which says "NO FMT FOUND"
> for the following trap.  But this entry shows no
> such wording, so it
> presumably is being properly formatted by what is in
> trapd.conf already.
> You didn't mention what you think is missing here. 
> But  this trap looks
> like all the proper elements have already been
> formatted in some fashion,
> and enterprise 1.3.6.1.4.1.94 is Nokia.  What is it
> that you think is
> missing here?
> 
> James Shanks
> Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and
> Windows
> Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com