RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map

nv-l

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map

2004-01-15 12:51:15

Subject:	RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map
From:	DSullinger AT dot.state.az DOT us
To:	nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:19:42 -0700

We deleted an ATM router from our all submaps and waited for it to rediscover the device an place it in the holding area. We waited a good hour and it still didn't show up. I did a nmdemandpoll on both the hub router connected to the ATM circuit and the ATM router itself. Demand poll did poll the device, but it still never showed up on the map. Do I need to do a ovtopofix -u to get it to show up?

Thanks

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger <= RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, James Shanks RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Ray Westphal RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Binder, Karin

Previous by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC 3.9, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage)
Next by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC 3.9, Christopher Haynes
Previous by Thread:	[nv-l] 2 Separate Questions: servmon and Unmanage, Catalina Martinez
Next by Thread:	RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]