RE: [nv-l] Netview Redundancy / Failover

2002-08-02 15:43:11
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Netview Redundancy / Failover
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>
To: <nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:43:11 -0500
So do I understand that one of the reasons to back up the database is to hang 
on to the unmanaged status? I guess that makes some sense.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hochstetler [mailto:shochste AT us.ibm DOT com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 1:57 PM
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Netview Redundancy / Failover


Your process is not wrong, if that is what is right for you.   If you have
automated your management (NetView opens trouble tickets automatically)
then there is less reliance on maps that are green.   If you manage via
maps, then you want acknowledgements, manage/unmanage actions to migrate to
your backup on a regular basis.

If you don't have the requirement to administer one map, then your way is
perfectly ok.    The right process is driven by your requirements, not what
the product can/cannot do.

Kind regards,
Stephen Hochstetler              shochste AT us.ibm DOT com
International Technical Support Organization  - Austin
Office - 512-436-8564                      FAX - 512-436-9326

ITSO redbooks at  http://www.redbooks.ibm.com

To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe AT lists.tivoli DOT com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help AT lists.tivoli DOT com

This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>