DD doesn't pay me either but IMHO but the idea of inline dedupe made
more sense to us simply due to the fact we wouldn't have to find
rack/floor space for significantly increased storage required by post
dedupe.

FYI:  EMC is pushing dedupe solutions as well.   There is a also a
company called Sepaton doing it.

You should probably get information from as many of these vendors as
possible then decide which makes sense to pursue for testing.

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Andrew
Stueve
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:52 PM
To: veritas-BU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Exagrid

I think that "post process vs. inline" is an important issue.

We evaluated both Netapp and Data Domain, before choosing the Data 
Domain solution.   One of reasons was that processing.

Post processing, means if you are writing 4 Tb of data on a weekend 
full, you have to have 4 Tb of free disk space to write it all, and then

it will compress down.

In-line, means that as you write that 4 Tb of data, you only have to 
have the space for the de-duped/compressed image.

I won't shill for Data Domain, since they don't pay me, but...

-Andrew

Fergus Donohue wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback. They sell a NAS based de-dupe device very 
> similar in concept to Data Domain, but it does post-process rather
than 
> in-line de-dupe. Price-wise they appear very competitive and I was 
> wondering if anyone had any real-world experience with them.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fergus.
> 
> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> Never heard of or used it myself Fergus.
>>
>> Justin.
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Fergus Donohue wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> Should I take the resounding silence as a "no" then? ;)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Fergus.
>>>
>>> Fergus Donohue wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The question has been asked here before, but things may have moved
on
>>>> since. Has anyone deployed an Exagrid solution in production and if
so,
>>>> how has it been?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Fergus.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>>
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu