[Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches
2006-04-07 11:49:50
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches |
From: |
GreenbergKA AT aetna DOT com (Greenberg, Katherine A) |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:49:50 -0400 |
Yahoo! Found the problem! Thank you so much Michael!!!
There is a Solaris linker patch (109147-39) that was withdrawn from
Sun's site that was originally part of the 10/2005 patch cluster. The
patch was replaced (109147-40) and we put it in, bounced the box and
things are working again.
Posting the technotes in case anyone else ever encounters these 13
errors on NetApp backups, as well as the rest of the problems we were
having.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6344952-1&search
clause=6332983%2420+%2420101995
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-34-withdrawn-1&sea
rchclause=6332983%2420+%2420101995
Glad all the patch revision levels were forwarded to Veritas and Sun for
their perusal :/
~Kate
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Greenberg,
Katherine A
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:57 PM
To: Jack Forester, Jr.; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris
patches
Yeah, well that is kind of the problem...
With the exception of the NDMP issues, everything is intermittent and if
you weren't really looking at things, it would just look like a flash in
the pan kind of error.
I've moved our NDMP backups to another Master (AIX) and they're working
fine over there...
Fun!
~Kate
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Jack
Forester, Jr.
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:54 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris
patches
We do patches on our Solaris master servers on a semi-annual basis. We
also take advantage of the fact that both our test and production
environments are clustered to minimize the chances that a bad patch will
hose the environment. We use a rolling upgrade method. First, we apply
patches to the standby node in the cluster and reboot. If, after a
week, we have no problems with the patches, we failover our NetBackup
and ACSLS services to the newly patched server and allow it to run there
for a week. If there are problems, we move the services back to the
unpatched node. If we have no problems, only then will we put the
patches on the other node in the cluster. Although we've not yet had
any problems with any patches, I feel pretty confident that we would not
be put out of business if a Solaris patch happened to break something
critical (unless it were something that didn't show up until after both
nodes in the cluster had been patched).
Jeff Lightner wrote:
>Support organizations not coming up with obvious solutions is something
>I'm fairly used to. In fact I've had occasions where I theorized as to
>the correct answer but was told by support that wasn't it only to later
>try it in desperation and find that it was indeed the fix.
>
>Perhaps Katherine's experience with support organizations has been
>better than mine. Is there one that doesn't always first suggest
>upgrading to their latest patch/release to fix whatever issue rather
>than doing basic troubleshooting?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of David
>Rock
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:19 AM
>To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris
>patches
>
>* Greenberg, Katherine A <GreenbergKA AT aetna DOT com> [2006-04-06 10:21]:
>
>
>>Don't think that is it, but who knows. I would hope that w/ Sun and
>>Veritas both heavily on the case someone would've come up with that by
>>now ;)
>>
>>
>
>LOL!!! Stop it, you're killing me.
>
>
>
--
Jack L. Forester, Jr.
UNIX Systems Administrator, Stf
Lockheed Martin Information Technology
(304) 625-3946
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
-----------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender
by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank you.
Aetna
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Greenberg, Katherine A
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Jeff Lightner
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Greenberg, Katherine A
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Greenberg, Katherine A
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Jeff Lightner
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Bob Stump
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Greenberg, Katherine A
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches,
Greenberg, Katherine A <=
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Paul Keating
- [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches, Greenberg, Katherine A
|
|
|