This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C48E60.67D8266C
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Jim,
Your configuration is correct you must have the robot defined in every media
server, without this this media server can not send request to the robot,
and always the control path must be in only one server, not every time the
Master, can be a media server, I have customers with the robotic control in
a Media Server.
Regards,
Nacho from Spain
-----Mensaje original-----
De: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]En nombre de Jim
VandeVegt
Enviado el: viernes, 27 de agosto de 2004 16:54
Para: veritas-bu AT eng.auburn DOT edu
Asunto: [Veritas-bu] Shared Robot on every media server?
I recently took over a NetBackup 5.0 installation. The installation is about
4 months old, SSO, Solaris master, mixture of Solaris and Win2000 media
servers, fibre attached LTO2 drives and robot.
My observation -- the robot is defined on each of the media servers.
What I'm looking at...
>From the jnbSA GUI, click Devices in the tree under "Media and Device
Management".
Then click the robots tab in the lower panel of the right side.
I see an entry for each media and master server with Robot Name TLD(0),
volume database is the master server for all entries, robotic path is blank
except for the master server, robot control host lists the master server for
all the media server entries.
It's my first time working hands-on with an SSO setup, I might be seeing a
by-product of the SSO setup. It just seems strange to have the robot defined
on each media server. I'm used to an environment where a tape drive may be
attached to server1 within a robot controlled by server2, and the robot is
not defined on server1.
Does this setup make sense to anyone, or does it seem outwardly wrong? The
system, BTW, is working OK.
Thanks,
Jim VandeVegt
vandevegt AT yahoo DOT com jim.vandevegt AT pmic DOT com
There is no luck except where there is discipline.
_____
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/50x/*http://promotions.yahoo.com/ne
w_mail/static/efficiency.html> Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
------_=_NextPart_001_01C48E60.67D8266C
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=468510707-30082004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Hi
Jim,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=468510707-30082004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=468510707-30082004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Your
configuration is correct you must have the robot defined in every media server,
without this this media server can not send request to the robot, and always
the
control path must be in only one server, not every time the Master, can be a
media server, I have customers with the robotic control in a Media
Server.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=468510707-30082004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=468510707-30082004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Regards,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=468510707-30082004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Nacho
from Spain</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Mensaje original-----<BR><B>De:</B>
veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]<B>En nombre de
</B>Jim
VandeVegt<BR><B>Enviado el:</B> viernes, 27 de agosto de 2004
16:54<BR><B>Para:</B> veritas-bu AT eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Asunto:</B>
[Veritas-bu]
Shared Robot on every media server?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>I recently took over a NetBackup 5.0 installation. The installation is
about 4 months old, SSO, Solaris master, mixture of Solaris and Win2000 media
servers, fibre attached LTO2 drives and robot.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>My observation -- the robot is defined on each of the media servers.
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>What I'm looking at...</DIV>
<DIV>From the jnbSA GUI, click Devices in the tree under "Media and Device
Management".</DIV>
<DIV>Then click the robots tab in the lower panel of the right side.</DIV>
<DIV>I see an entry for each media and master server with Robot Name TLD(0),
volume database is the master server for all entries, robotic path is blank
except for the master server, robot control host lists the master server for
all the media server entries.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It's my first time working hands-on with an SSO setup, I might be seeing
a by-product of the SSO setup. It just seems strange to have the robot
defined
on each media server. I'm used to an environment where a tape drive may be
attached to server1 within a robot controlled by server2, and the robot
is not defined on server1.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Does this setup make sense to anyone, or does it seem outwardly
wrong? The system, BTW, is working OK.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><BR><BR>Jim VandeVegt<BR>vandevegt AT yahoo DOT com
jim.vandevegt AT pmic DOT com<BR>There is no luck except where there is
discipline.
<P>
<HR SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<BR><A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/50x/*http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail/static/efficiency.html";>Yahoo!
Mail</A> - 50x more storage than other providers!</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C48E60.67D8266C--
|
