Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] OTM vs VSP (veritas snapshot provider)

2003-09-19 09:45:44
Subject: [Veritas-bu] OTM vs VSP (veritas snapshot provider)
From: charles.hart AT medtronic DOT com (Hart, Charles)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 08:45:44 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C37EB4.52ACF068
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The VSP first appeared in 4.5 FP3, We had to turn it off, as it created =
huge image files on the backup clients and brought performance to a =
crawl.  I spoke to Veritas Tech support about it and he laughed and =
stated we call VSP "Virus Spreading Program" here amongst out tech =
support people.  I have no idea if its better in FP4 or FP5...
=20
=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark T Wragge [mailto:storage AT ttt DOT ie]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:29 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] OTM vs VSP (veritas snapshot provider)


Hi,  have any of you upgraded netbackup 4.5 to FP5 so that you are no =
longer using OTM for Windows servers.  Is VSP a better tool for backing =
up open files and is it more reliable than OTM.
=20
Thanks,  Mark


------_=_NextPart_001_01C37EB4.52ACF068
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">


<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1226" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D787224313-19092003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>The=20
VSP first appeared in 4.5 FP3, We had to turn it off, as it created huge =
image=20
files on the backup clients and brought performance to a crawl.&nbsp; I =
spoke to=20
Veritas Tech support about it and he laughed and stated we call VSP =
"Virus=20
Spreading Program" here amongst out tech support people.&nbsp; I have no =
idea if=20
its better in FP4 or FP5...</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D787224313-19092003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D787224313-19092003></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
  size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Mark T Wragge=20
  [mailto:storage AT ttt DOT ie]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 19, 2003 =
8:29=20
  AM<BR><B>To:</B> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu<BR><B>Subject:</B>=20
  [Veritas-bu] OTM vs VSP (veritas snapshot =
provider)<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,&nbsp; have any of you upgraded =
netbackup=20
  4.5&nbsp;to FP5 so that you are no longer using OTM for Windows =
servers.&nbsp;=20
  Is VSP a better tool for backing up open files and is it more reliable =
than=20
  OTM.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,&nbsp;=20
Mark</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C37EB4.52ACF068--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>