Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?

2002-07-09 10:43:55
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?
From: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:43:55 -0600
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C22757.0D103840
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

Just a quick note that a big disappointment to me is that in-line copy is
part of the separately licensed Vault option.  Unfortunately, my company is
not willing to buy the whole product to get this one feature.
 
-M

-----Original Message-----
From: Fabbro, Andrew P [mailto:Fabbro.Andrew AT cnf DOT com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:28 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?


My understanding from NB notes I've read is that 4.5 supports in-line backup
copies.  e.g., you backup a client and write the backup to two tapes at the
same time.  The NB release notes say you can do up to 9 copies at the same
time.
 
Putting additional drives needed, etc. aside for a moment, it seems like it
could be a good way to make offsite/disaster recovery backups without the
hassle of either duplicating tapes (which doesn't scale well) or running
another full backup
for offsite/DR purposes.  I assume one could use Pool A for one copy and
Pool B for another and send Pool B offsite.
 
Some questions:
 

- Has anyone used inline copying?  How well does it work?  
 
- In NB 3.4.x, to use a duplicate of a tape, you need to flip it to the
primary copy.  It's easy enough to script - does NB 4.5 work the same way?
 
- What about shared memory usage?  The calculation for NB 3.4 is number of
data buffers x size of data buffers x number of drives x MPX per drive.  For
a box driving DLT (64512 data buffer size recommended, maybe 64 data
buffers), it's not a major factor - usually not over 128Mb (say, 8 drives at
4 MPX each).  With more recent technologies, you want fatter buffers, more
buffers, and more MPX - easily 512Mb of shared memory, maybe more.  But I
can't imagine all of that is just to drive the tape - some of it is network
buffering, right?  So if I need X kilobytes of shared memory for a tape
drive, do I need X times 2 for two drives doing the same backup in an
in-line backup?  Or is it more like X times 1.5  (or whatever)?
 
Thanks,
 
 
-drew
  fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT com <mailto:fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT com> 
 

 


------_=_NextPart_001_01C22757.0D103840
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">


<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=381014314-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Just 
a 
quick note that a big disappointment to me is that in-line copy is part of the 
separately licensed Vault option.&nbsp; Unfortunately, my company is not 
willing 
to buy the whole product to get this one feature.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=381014314-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=381014314-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>-M</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Fabbro, Andrew P 
  [mailto:Fabbro.Andrew AT cnf DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, July 08, 2002 
11:28 
  PM<BR><B>To:</B> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> 
  [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>My understanding 
  from NB notes I've read is that 4.5 supports in-line backup copies.&nbsp; 
  e.g., you backup a client and write the backup to two tapes at the same 
  time.&nbsp; The NB release notes say you can do up to 9 copies at the same 
  time.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
  class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>Putting 
additional 
  drives needed, etc. aside for a moment, it seems like it could be a good way 
  to make offsite/disaster recovery backups without the hassle of either 
  duplicating tapes (which doesn't scale well) or running another full 
  backup</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>for offsite/DR 
  purposes.&nbsp; I assume one could use Pool A for one copy and Pool B for 
  another and send Pool B offsite.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
  class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>Some 
  questions:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
  class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><SPAN 
  class=569531405-09072002>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>- Has anyone used 
  inline copying?&nbsp; How well does it work?&nbsp; </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
  class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>- </SPAN>In 
  NB 3.4.x, to use a duplicate of a tape, you need to flip it to the primary 
  copy.&nbsp; It's easy enough to script - does NB 4.5 work the same 
  way?</FONT></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV></SPAN><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial size=2>- What 
  about shared memory usage?&nbsp; The calculation for NB 3.4 is number of data 
  buffers x size of data buffers x number of drives x MPX per drive.&nbsp; For 
a 
  box driving DLT (64512 data buffer size recommended, maybe 64 data buffers), 
  it's not a major factor - usually not over 128Mb (say, 8 drives at 4 MPX 
  each).&nbsp; With more recent technologies, you want fatter buffers, more 
  buffers, and more MPX - easily 512Mb of shared memory, maybe more.&nbsp; But 
I 
  can't imagine all of that is just to drive the tape - some of it is network 
  buffering, right?&nbsp; So if I need X kilobytes of shared memory for a tape 
  drive, do I need X times 2 for two drives doing the same backup in an in-line 
  backup?&nbsp; Or is it more like X times 1.5&nbsp; (or 
  whatever)?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2>Thanks,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
  size=2>-drew</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT 
  color=#0000ff>&nbsp;</FONT><A 
  href="mailto:fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT com">fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT 
com</A></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
  class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN 
  
class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></SPAN></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C22757.0D103840--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>