Re: [Networker] volretent versus save set expirations
2006-07-10 17:12:13
Darren -
Thanks for running this in the lab. After your findings I'm
definitely going to keep the extra sanity check in my procedure.
Kevin
On 2006-07-10 13:24, Darren Dunham wrote:
> > I'm new to networker so I might have my semantics wrong as
> > far as what volretent means.
> >
> > I would assume (thats the first problem right? ;-) that volretent would
> > be equal to the latest expiration on all contained save sets? Is
> > this my misunderstanding?
>
> Hm.. I thought this was true. But I just tried some stuff (on 6.1.2)
> and found that extending the retent time of a saveset did not also
> extend the retent time of a (expired) volume.
>
> --
> Darren Dunham ddunham AT taos DOT
> com
> Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/
> Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|