Networker

Re: [Networker] 6.2 vs. 7.1

2004-01-20 16:56:53
Subject: Re: [Networker] 6.2 vs. 7.1
From: Shawn Cox <shawn.cox AT PCCA DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:56:41 -0600
I have been very happy with the transition to v7.1 from v6.x.  I had
support, but did have to purchase an enabler for teir 1 disk backup
option(which I was a little unhappy about).
My networker server is a Windows 2003 box and I have had no trouble with
Networker.

--Shawn



----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Crossman" <pcrossma AT ORANGE DOT US>
To: <NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: [Networker] 6.2 vs. 7.1


I'd be interested in users opinions of Networker 6.2 vs. Networker 7.1
running on Windows 2000?

I've been running 6.2 for about 14 months now, and have had two major
problems that I can neither point to hardware or software.

Would there be any benefit to me upgrading?  I'll have to justify this
to my superiors as we've cut waaaay back on support and won't be able to
take all of the enablers with us.

Thanks,
Paul C.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>