Hello!

Yura Pismerov wrote on 2003-07-10 10:04:37 -0400:
>       I guess you are out of luck with this design. You either need another
> server on the target network, or you have to setup 1:1 NAT to the
> existing one.

Simon Jorgensen wrote on 2003-07-10 16:05:25 +0200:
> Your clients need to be in contact with the networker server, even when
> backing up using a storage node. Only the actual data stream goes to the
> storage node, while all meta data (index updates etc.) goes directly to the
> nsrmmdbd and nsrindexd processes on the server.
>
> So storage nodes isn't the solution to your problem...

Well, thanks for the information - i think i will add a second NIC
into my master server, because every other possible solution makes a
lot more work...


With kind regards,

        Frank Altpeter

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=