Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula LTO-5

2017-06-01 08:52:24
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula LTO-5
From: Cejka Rudolf <cejkar AT fit.vutbr DOT cz>
To: Richard Fox <mbl AT richfox DOT org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:51:25 +0200
Richard Fox wrote (2017/06/01):
> Otherwise, this advice is a little contradictory to the documentation which 
> states "On most modern tape drives, you will not need to specify this 
> directive.". 

Given that Linux with LTO-X tape drive is probably a majority system here (not 
counting
configurations without tape drives), the statement is slightly misleading. I'm 
convinced
that it is really not needed because of tape drive, server nor HBA, but it 
seems that it
is really needed because of Linux. However it is not a real problem, because 
Linux allows
to increase the block size "naturally", with the exception that you have 
limiting HBA.

> More importantly however, the documentation (for Bacula 7.2 anyways) says: 
> "The maximum size-in-bytes possible is 2,000,000." which contradicts the 
> assertion that these can be specified as 2MB which is not the same thing. Is 
> the documentation inaccurate on this subject?

I wrote 2 MB as a general recommendation over various manufacturers and software
developers, with non-written suggested value 256 KB or 512 KB as max., so please
take my 2 MB limit just loosely :o)

-- 
Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology
Bozetechova 2, 612 66  Brno, Czech Republic

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by https://kimlaw.us