Re: [Bacula-users] Client and director mis-match, acceptable?

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tom Plancon <tplancon AT bkaarchs DOT com> wrote:

I'm setting up bacula on a CentOS 7 machine. Using yum to install I get bacula 7.0.5-7 installed. A client I want to back up is running CentOS 6.8 and yum wants to install bacula 5.0.0-13 there. I've found rpms for the client, fd, that are version 7.0.5-7 but trying to install them on CentOS 6.8 is a struggle with the dependencies, and I'm concerned using an "rpm --nodeps or --force" will break something.
What is the recommended procedure for matching clients and directors on disparate systems? Any suggestions greatly appreciated!

If you don't want to use the RHEL/CentOS provided packages I also maintain a backport repository. In place upgrade from 5.x is supported, just pay attention to the database upgrade:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/slaanesh/Bacula/

Please read the various docs as described.

Regards,

--Simone

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Bacula-users] Client and director mis-match, acceptable?, Tom Plancon Re: [Bacula-users] Client and director mis-match, acceptable?, Wanderlei Huttel Re: [Bacula-users] Client and director mis-match, acceptable?, Simone Caronni <=