Re: [Bacula-users] Client and director mis-match, acceptable?

Hello Thomas

The client in a prior version of (director and storage) is acceptable, but client in a higher version of (director and storage) no.

The general rule:

- director always must be in the same version of storage

- client can be in the same version of director and storage or in a prior version

Or you can compile a new one.

http://bacula.us/compilation/

Best regards

Wanderlei Hüttel

http://www.huttel.com.br

2017-04-18 12:49 GMT-03:00 Tom Plancon <tplancon AT bkaarchs DOT com>:

Hi all,
I'm setting up bacula on a CentOS 7 machine. Using yum to install I get bacula 7.0.5-7 installed. A client I want to back up is running CentOS 6.8 and yum wants to install bacula 5.0.0-13 there. I've found rpms for the client, fd, that are version 7.0.5-7 but trying to install them on CentOS 6.8 is a struggle with the dependencies, and I'm concerned using an "rpm --nodeps or --force" will break something.
What is the recommended procedure for matching clients and directors on disparate systems? Any suggestions greatly appreciated!
Thanks!

--
Thomas Plancon
CAD/IT MANAGER

E: tplancon AT bkaarchs DOT com
W: www.bkaarchitects.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users