On 10/02/2016 08:57 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/02/16 14:41, Ian Douglas wrote:
>> On Sunday 02 October 2016 18:56:31 Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>
>>> For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far*
>>> easier to use bconsole.  Bat is far more useful when you are looking at
>>> a number of Volumes or Job reports, ...   Bat is not particularly good
>>> at doing console type input.
>> Just found it odd, I assumed bat was a frontend to bconsole and so didn't
>> bother trying bconsole because I figured if bat couldn't make it work, I
>> wouldn't be able to either ...
> No, it's more of an alternate console.  But there are some things it
> doesn't do well, like handling multiple warning/confirmation/status
> messages emitted from a single command.
Good explanation -- 100% correct.
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users