On 10/02/16 14:41, Ian Douglas wrote:
> On Sunday 02 October 2016 18:56:31 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> 
>> For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far* 
>> easier to use bconsole.  Bat is far more useful when you are looking at 
>> a number of Volumes or Job reports, ...   Bat is not particularly good 
>> at doing console type input.
> 
> Just found it odd, I assumed bat was a frontend to bconsole and so didn't 
> bother trying bconsole because I figured if bat couldn't make it work, I 
> wouldn't be able to either ...

No, it's more of an alternate console.  But there are some things it
doesn't do well, like handling multiple warning/confirmation/status
messages emitted from a single command.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  phils AT caerllewys DOT net
  phil AT co.ordinate DOT org
  Landline: 603.293.8485

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users