Bacula-users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Bacula-users] Server version Vs Client Version

2016-09-14 01:35:23
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Server version Vs Client Version
From: Ralf Brinkmann <ralf.brinkmann AT wemhoener DOT de>
To: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>, Gael Guilmin <Gael.Guilmin AT PDGM DOT com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:34:02 +0200 
Am 12.09.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heitor Faria:
> No. Daemons version should be DIR == SD >= FD.

A question to the other way around.

Due to a new LTO6 tape changer and a slightly newer Bacula host hardware
I recently did update this host to the latest Bacula version 7.4.0.
Everything is running fine.

Is it worth to update the 5.2.x client FDs on all the servers for any
reason?

-- 
Ralf Brinkmann

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Bacula-users] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Server version Vs Client Version, Gael Guilmin
Next by Date:  [Bacula-users] Concurrent Copy and Backup Jobs, Martin Reissner
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Bacula-users] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Server version Vs Client Version, Gael Guilmin
Next by Thread:  [Bacula-users] Recycle Tape marked used but not the oldest volume., Gi Dot
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]