Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] tape migration (within a pool)

2016-04-14 09:19:51
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] tape migration (within a pool)
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:18:43 +0100
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:43:57 -0300 (BRT), Heitor Faria said:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alan Brown" <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
> > To: "Bacula Users" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 1:28:39 PM
> > Subject: [Bacula-users] tape migration (within a pool)
> 
> > For various reasons I've ended up with a large number of tapes that only
> > have a few GB on them (tape drive issues caused by a contaminated
> > tape(*)) and this is burning up pool spares.
> > 
> > I want to migrate the files on those tapes to newer tapes within the
> > same pool, then recyle the original tapes.
> > 
> > Not the entire JobID, just the parts which are on the tapes in question.
> > 
> > Does anyone have a recipe for this?
> 
> Hello, Alan. Migrate and copy jobs support a Selection Type = Volume, that
> combines with the Selection Pattern directive, that receives a RegExp for
> the Volume names you want to migrate.

Are you sure that does what Alan wants?  I think migration always migrates
complete jobs.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>