Re: [Bacula-users] Read-only device resources

Hello Josh,

Are you using a physical or virtual autochanger?

I haven´t tried the read-only feature yet. But I was wondering if in the case of a physical autochanger you could have the read-only drive also configured as a standalone drive. This way it would be possible to configure your Virtual Full to use this standalone drive for reading and all the other ones for writing.

Best regards,

Ana

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com> wrote:

Is anyone using the relatively new read-only feature of Device
resources? I had thought to use this feature to reserve an autochanger
drive as the read drive for virtual full backups. But in a two-drive
autochanger, making drive 1 read-only is problematic. A virtual full job
will select the read drive before it selects the write drive. I have
confirmed that it will, or at least can, select drive 0 (the read/write
drive) as the read drive for the virtual full job and then be stuck
without a writable drive, causing the job to fail. I would have thought
that when selecting a read drive for a virtual full or copy job that the
selection would prefer an available read-only drive over an available
read/write drive, but that does not seem to be the case. Any thoughts?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users